1. ricardobeat 18 hours ago
    I’m sure they are conveniently skirting some regulations in the name of speed, and should not be allowed to do so, but is there hard data on pollution levels increasing around the area? Haven’t seen it in any of these reports, instead there are FLIR videos of “pollution” coming out of the turbines.
    1. bradgranath 11 hours ago
      If your neighbor fired up 35 construction/welding generators across the street you'd notice the smell, right?

      These things are turbines, each the size of a shipping container.

      I don't think you need IR evidence to know that it would be unpleasant.

  2. drexlspivey 19 hours ago
    I was under the impression that they specifically picked this location because there is a big power plant nearby which they can hook into. Why are they building their own turbines?
    1. nikanj 19 hours ago
      Power plant needs to follow environmental reqs which leads to higher energy cost. Burning fuel on-site with no emissions control is cheaper
      1. SR2Z 13 hours ago
        Sure, but the difference between burning propane without a filter and coal with a filter is probably not that large. Propane is a clean-burning fuel.
        1. Craighead 13 hours ago
          [dead]
  3. James_K 19 hours ago
    Every year, it becomes more and more apparent that the philosophy of tech companies is to break or avoid the law and hope you're too big for the government to do something about it.
  4. blibble 19 hours ago
    the real weakness of the "AI industry" seems to be the massive increase in CO2 emissions required

    if I was trying to kill it politically that's exactly what I'd focus on

    1. unstablediffusi 18 hours ago
      [dead]
  6. steeve 18 hours ago
    Musk doing Musk things